The Fuentes Populist Proposal

My agreements and my criticisms

Hello everyone, it has been a minute since I posted in long-format. My classes have become quite essay heavy, so I have been unable to find much time to write for you all here. However, I have come down with a bad illness, so while I am sick and not doing anything, I figured I would write to you.

I am going to make it clear before I continue that while I don’t disagree with everything Fuentes says, I am not a Groyper. I have heavily criticized Nick in the past. I have my own set of Nationalist beliefs that are independent of much of these public figures, though we still share some common positions. That said, the attacks on him and Tucker from the Israel-First portion of the GOP is something that I condemn.

Nick said on his recent show that the anti-establishment progressive left and nationalist right should get together to put forth policies. He also said that both sides were going to have to give up something. For the left, that is mass immigration, for the right, that is complete adherence to the free-market.

A commonsense proposal. I have proposed it myself before. It is clear that welfare states cannot coexist with mass migration. Universal healthcare doesn’t work if everyone in the world can just come in and sign up for it. That is what gets your native population angry; when the benefits promised to them are shoved aside for others.

Even private healthcare, which we have now, can’t keep up with the burdens of mass migration. Hospitals must spend money on things like interpreters and other accommodations on the chance they get someone from, I don’t know, Uganda coming into the emergency room.

The same thing happens to our public schools. When it was announced that the feds were going into Charlotte, North Carolina, a story came out where around 20,000 students suddenly became absent from class due to the threat of detainment and deportation of them and their families. That is a big deal.

So yes, I believe that what Fuentes says here would work. The problem is, even if the right gave up the free-market, the left would never give up immigration. In fact, I would dare say that the likelihood of the right giving up the free market is greater than the left giving up immigration.

If we were talking about the Old Left, I would say that it is probably doable. The issue is that most leftism in America today is a result of New Left thought. The New Left sees the US as a colonial settler state that is illegally occupying the land it controls.

In essence, the contemporary left is an entirely anti-American and anti-White ideology. They can’t give up mass migration because mass migration, in their mind, is the only way to extract justice against the White settler colonialists that came up with the concept of America.

Their crusade against “White supremacy” is ultimately a crusade against America itself, because the entire concept of America, in their minds, is White supremacist. We saw this in 2020. They used a druggie’s death to justify vandalism of historical monuments and destruction of cultural heritage.

This is all the while they say that they want healthcare for all. I wonder if that healthcare for all will cover the “fascists” who get beaten by their anarchist mobs.

The sad truth of the matter is that the modern nationalist right and progressive left are irreconcilable. While we can agree on things such as worker’s rights and trust busting, that’s where it ends. In order to have a coalition like Fuentes proposed, the entire underlying anti-American, anti-White ideology of the modern left must be uprooted.

Yes, there was a cross-ideological agreement on the Epstein Files. That’s great. It still doesn’t change the fact that the modern left wants to gradually destroy the American nation. Some of them may be publicly polite about it, but it all ends the same way. The only leftists I can think of that would take this proposal seriously is ShoeOnHead (who is married to a right-winger) and the fringe American Communist Party (not to be confused with Communist Party USA).

What Fuentes should probably do instead is create his own party that runs on ending migration while not being free-market absolutists beholden to special interests. If the left won’t cede ground to us, then we must take the ground out from under their feet.

If the anti-American, anti-White leftists can’t run as the sole gatekeepers of healthcare, then they have a problem, because healthcare seems to be the only thing keeping them afloat these days. Take their monopoly on the healthcare debate away and they crumble with moderates and fence sitters.

This doesn’t mean that the right must become welfare absolutists either. Our welfare programs are rampant with fraud. This needs to be addressed as well. People who don’t need benefits or are abusing the benefits system must be uncovered. Those TikTokers who foolishly post about their 3000 dollars in SNAP buying a bunch of junk food need to be locked up.

My main point is, while a coalition between the nationalist right and the progressive left sounds good in theory, in reality it will never work due to the social issues that both sides represent. Instead, we on the nationalist right should be forming our own organizations and alternatives to take key issues from the left while still maintaining our nationalist values.

The progs giving up immigration would throw away too much of their base, as they have built up from minority grievance culture, and would make them the junior partner in the nationalist/progressive coalition. There would be no profit for them here.

I’m sure that Fuentes understands this though and is proposing this as an experimental olive branch to see who takes it.

How you can support my writing. Thank you for reading.

• Tip via Buy Me A Coffee

• Liking and restacking to reach a wider audience

• Becoming a paid subscriber